Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc D Grossman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 03:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marc D Grossman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed with the apparent basis he's notable because of his cases and status as an attorney; I still confirm my PROD as this is still advertorial and questionable for his own convincing notability. Notifying DGG for his subject analysis. SwisterTwister talk 17:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. pure advertisement. I consider this a G11. Even the infobox contributes : Known for "Top 10 Largest Volume of Mass Tort Clients in the United States," " Among the Top 5 Attorneys Currently Appointed and Working on the most Plaintiffs' Steering Committees in the United State" Just what he would say in an advertisement. DGG ( talk ) 17:46, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
For historical notations, I'll also note Draft:Marc D. Grossman. SwisterTwister talk 17:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable personal injury attorney. These are the type of attorneys who most agressively market themselves, and thus also the ones where we are most likely to see such occur on Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:05, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, WP:NOTRESUME; I agree this could have been speedied as WP:G11, but may as well let the afd run its course to nail it down. TJRC (talk) 04:01, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.