Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Carl
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:23, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Marc Carl[edit]
- Marc Carl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sounds like an interesting fellow, but I am unable to find reliable, secondary sources which provide in-depth coverage of this author, ecologist and human. I did add a ref to the article which contains a footnote to his book, but I don't believe the coverage I've found rises to meet the general notability guideline. joe deckertalk to me 04:34, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Granted it can be hard to find stuff on someone from an earlier era, but Google News found absolutely nothing, and Google Books found just one of his books plus one passing reference in another book. I was going to suggest a redirect to Gaia Mater but that article looks like it has notability problems too. --MelanieN (talk) 03:08, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 10:21, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems to be an undersourced autobiography. Wikipedian2 (talk) 16:35, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.