Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maplestory Quests

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --Daniel Olsen 03:31, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maplestory Quests[edit]

Delete: Already lives at StrategyWiki (see link at the bottom of the article). This would need a rewrite to be encyclopedic. De-prodded by author. —Wknight94 (talk) 04:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete provides very little context, wikipedia is not an instruction manual, it sounds like it was copied from and instruction manual and it already exists at strategy wiki. James086^{Talk | Contribs} 05:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, from a quick glance, it's mostly a direct-copy subset of the StrategyWiki page it links to. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to MapleStory, not important enough for its own article. VegaDark 06:33, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

comment The "What links here" list shows that this can safely be deleted, as it is unlikely anyone is going to go directly to this page, and since nothing links to it, no one will end up here. Leave it empty. i kan reed 23:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I voted redirect to primarily discourage recreation. IMO it's a better method than salting, becase salted pages can show up via clicking random article. VegaDark 00:33, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears that this is already included at StrategyWiki.SkierRMH 08:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Wikipedia is not a game guide. MER-C 10:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - game-guidey dreck. Moreschi 20:17, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 03:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.