Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mansel Close

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:37, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mansel Close[edit]

I nominated this page for a speedy deletion under A7 however I was notified that it did not fall under this category because it was a place. I was further advised to nominate it for AfD if I still believe it should go, which I am doing. I believe that not only does this article provide no context, however I also believe that it is not notable. Aka042 (talk) 01:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence (or assertion) of notability for this road. JJL (talk) 02:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Wexham, the road's city. Cunard (talk) 06:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We don't need redirects for 40-house roads.--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 18:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I have already reverted the gang nonsense this page was originally created with from the Wexham article, and as S Marshall says we have no need for redirects of minor roads for relatively small places. -- role^player 00:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. ~~-- Abecedare (talk) 18:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)~~[reply]

What does this discussion have to do with Hinduism? -- role^player 20:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops ... I have no idea either :) Abecedare (talk) 20:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing in the article or found via Google that indicates notability. Merge not needed as there is lack of substantial, verifiable content, and unlikely term for linking or searching (also not a unique name, at least four other streets with this name in the UK, assuming none are trap streets). —Snigbrook 01:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.