Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manos: The Grasp of Fate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 03:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Manos: The Grasp of Fate[edit]
- Manos: The Grasp of Fate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable fan film that fails guidelines at WP:NF. The film has less than 800 views since its YouTube release in August 2007.[1] –Dream out loud (talk) 19:41, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No reliable sources in the <40 ghits for the film's title. JulesH (talk) 09:49, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. decltype 16:22, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete 800 youtube views in 1.5 years alone is a good sign that this is incredibly nonnotable. – sgeureka t•c 14:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note This AFD was apparently not listed until this point of time. Also, an IP user removed the AFD banner from the article with the comment "Article is relevant as there are stage productions of the original 'Manos' mentioned under cult films"[2] which should probably be interpreted as a keep !vote. JulesH (talk) 15:55, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- While "notability isn't inherited" doesn't always apply (WP:MUSIC is one exception). In this case, the existence of a notable stage production is pretty much a given, since fanfilms have to be a fan of something. It does nothing to make the subject of the article notable or otherwise stand out. - Mgm|(talk) 12:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977Talk to meMy edits 21:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of general notability. —Erik (talk • contrib) 22:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If it ever attains the notability of it namesake let it come back. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable. No significant coverage in reliable sources. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 00:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unless a fan film is considered notable, I don't see why it can't be deleted. Pastor Theo (talk) 02:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.