Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manor rama pictures (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:42, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Manor rama pictures[edit]
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Manor rama pictures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Rejected draft, the company lacks in depth sources Pikavoom (talk) 13:08, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:28, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:28, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The sources do not appear to provide the reliable in-depth independent coverage of the subject that would be needed for notability through WP:GNG. Also a piece of advertisement. DMySon (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom; references lack depth. --Whiteguru (talk) 01:40, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nom and above delete voters. lacks in-depth coverage. Chelokabob (talk) 02:54, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Typical production house problem. Producing notable work doesn't make production houses notable de facto. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 00:10, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.