Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Menda

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:32, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Manoj Menda[edit]

Manoj Menda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of satisfying WP:GNG. References are mere mentions and profiles. Google search of him hasn't turned up anything better. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Vanity article of a non-notable businessman. Del per nom. RationalPuff (talk) 15:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Nothing cited indicates notability. FalconK (talk) 03:46, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:TNT, WP:MILL, and WP:SIGCOV. I don't think the mess of poor coding and typos can be fixed via ordinary editing. It's not worth it for this run of the mill businessperson. The sourcing is weak. Bearian (talk) 12:30, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.