Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manny Lehman (disc jockey)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Passes WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. (non-admin closure) Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:35, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Manny Lehman (disc jockey)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Once I trimmed all the uncited content (much of which was dubious hyberbole), there is no demonstration of notability. Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO and WP:NMUSICIAN. Edwardx (talk) 23:44, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works..."..."Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart.": Lehman's life, career and work biography covered by Billboard (divided into two pages 26-27),[1], album review by Billboard,[2][3], full life biography covered by Noize Magazine,[4] biography covered by QV Magazine,[5], career biography featured by Metro News,[6], work biography covered by Chicago Pride news article,[7], Ambush magazine,[8], Original Express Gay News,[9] and of course, he's been a Billboard chart topper.[10] (for the interested ones, I loved this tete-a-tete between Lehman and other mix legends in the Red Bull Music Academy Daily:[11] Lourdes 00:45, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:32, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Sources identified above demonstrate notability. --Michig (talk) 08:13, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep At first I thought this was going to fail but then I scanned through Lourdes' sources and agree with her. L3X1 (distænt write) 13:25, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Lourdes' findings; subject meets WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC. gongshow talk 07:14, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.