Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MannaRelief

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:49, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MannaRelief[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD-contested by article creator. Potentially non-notable per WP:ORG. Lacks third-party sources. Has a possible WP:COI issue. Possible cut-and-paste move or article recreation when created. Reads like an advert. elektrik SHOOS 21:30, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Organization does not seem notable. Diego Grez ^{what's up?} 21:40, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Content was written from scratch. Third-party source was added. How can others be invited to add content? Is there a specific place I can place a request.. such as an Article Request? jaredhimself ^talk 21:57, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, no advertising was intended. It reads similar to that of other similar non-profit organization pages on Wikipedia. jaredhimself ^talk 22:04, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak~~ Delete: I'm also having significant trouble finding independent sources. I did find one that could be usable, but that seems to be the only one. However, if more can be found, I would be willing to change my vote. The weak part is simply because the COI issues, advert issues, and original cut-and-paste (now rectified) are no reasons to delete an article. It seems like this organization could prove to be notable, it just needs sources and more info. If those can't be provided, then delete. Evidence of notability is not coming forward as promised by the main editor, and it's seeming like the organization simply doesn't meet WP:CORP. GorillaWarfare ^talk 13:34, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and notable content added. Kruely (talk) 01:27, 29 July 2010 (UTC)— Kruely (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

The sources are unrelated to the company, only related to hunger information. No additional information asserting the notability of the organization seems to have been added. GorillaWarfare ^talk 02:54, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources support why the organization provides the nutrient delivery services. The context in which hunger is used relates to malnutrition and how current relief efforts aren't solving the problem of malnutrition. The organization works to correct, or add to, the current relief efforts by providing nutrient-dense supplements, which one of the sources (Doctors Without Borders) has called for. More information is still needed and, for the sake of the organization, hopefully it will be added. Kruely (talk) 05:02, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was simply coat-racking and providing not support for the notability of this organisation. --Cameron Scott (talk) 08:00, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree -- a notable problem does not necessarily make an organization trying to fix the problem notable. GorillaWarfare ^talk 13:32, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:03, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Organisation fails WP:CORP. --Cameron Scott (talk) 08:00, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Without third party sources, this is simply too spammy. VQuakr (talk) 15:10, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.