Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manion's

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 20:45, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Manion's[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm being cautious about this one - it was tagged for speedy deletion, however they claim to be notable as the largest online auction house in their speciality. Taking to AFD for further discussion. Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 06:05, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless some references are made to literature or sites other than Manion's own. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 06:07, 10 February 2010 (UTC) Changed to Tentative keep. Looks better; still not sure if it satisfies notability but WP:IDONTLIKEIT isn't allowed, so I can't complain :) Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 07:57, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Some of these references should help. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:56, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:57, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.