Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mangeshda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-27 07:28Z

Mangeshda[edit]

editor keeps adding inappropriate speedy tag, procedural nomination, no vote A Ramachandran 13:57, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- Mereda 16:16, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article needs serious work — I added the NPOV and cleanup tags, so I have no artificial bias here. But the fact that he was interviewed in Times of India makes him notable enough. ॐ Priyanath talk 21:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - notable guru and toi cements that.Baka man 21:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unnotable. "Sadguru Mangeshda" only returned 367 hits from Google. Times of India interview is nothing but deceptive propaganda. There was no interview. Times of India articles are online at The Times of India: Breaking news, views, reviews, cricket from across India and fully searchable. Search on "Mangeshda" returned zero results. Spam, 100% waste of Wikipedia space. Terminator III 22:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If he was mentioned in Times of India, he's notable, but there is no source for that, so I don't believe it. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 00:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No reliable sources. Google results without Wikipedia do not indicate notability. utcursch | talk 11:37, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.