Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandarin Restaurants

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 14:17, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mandarin Restaurants[edit]

Not notable, advertising. I have speedied this before and it has been re-created with protestations from the author, so I concluded that a discussion at AFD may be the best way to handle this. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 19:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Prehaps alerting the user as to why the article deserves an AfD nomination would help as well? Tarheel95 (talk) 20:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:17, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:17, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:17, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It is as well known and as much of a household name in Ontario as P. F. Chang is in California. Owen× ☎ 23:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This restaurant chain has received a fair bit of news coverage, recently because of their buffet promotion mentioned in the article. 68.244.143.236 (talk) 06:40, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep company has received sufficient 3rd party coverage to meet notability requirements. Article does need to be improved however.--RadioFan (talk) 11:38, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I saw this on the news yesterday. Buffet was free, cops needs for crowd control. People were turned away. Thewalrus69 (talk) 23:14, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Added third-party publication on Mandarin from the Toronto Star. I enjoy eating there, but notability by third-party publications is more important than one's own opinion. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 01:19, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Added CTV News Toronto regarding crowd control. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 01:41, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.