Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 15:30, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manchin[edit]

Appears to be either a neologism or a hoax. I cannot locate any sources that indicate this actually exists. After the article was tagged for speedy deletion a "reference" was added in the form of a link to a 404 page (that is, the purported reference was 404 when I checked it within 15 minutes of it being added). --Clubjuggle ^T/C 21:53, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now. No evidence presented that such a thing exists. Oren0 (talk) 21:59, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My girlfriend has one is that source enough? http://www.tattoofashion.com/actalog/manchin.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inetace (talk • contribs)

Not even close. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That constitutes original research and also fails verifiability. The link you provided is bad, I get a 404 not found error when I click it. --Clubjuggle ^T/C 22:10, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First off, that link you provided doesn't work. Secondly, even if it did, there are notability requirements for something being on Wikipedia. Specifically, something has to be mentioned in reliable sources to be included. Do you know of any articles in newspapers, magazines, books, major websites, etc. about this topic? Oren0 (talk) 22:12, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- I can find no evidence that this even exists, much less anything that would convince me of notability. Reyk _YO! 22:56, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NN, lack of WP:RS & WP:V. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 01:30, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unverified and possible hoax. --Cocomonkilla ^{(talk) (contrib)} 02:23, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:20, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails notability and verifiability. Can this be snowed? Artene50 (talk) 10:08, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 21:07, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a web search provides no relevant links, and there are no reliable sources provided within the article which prove either notability (or even existence) or verifiability. - Toon⁰⁵ 22:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.