Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manami Ui

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as nothing else has been suggested so far, and the fact there's several works is enough (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 06:30, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Manami Ui[edit]

Manami Ui (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NACTOR. TomStar81 (Talk) 05:22, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - She is less an actor than a model and a TV talent. There is quite a lot of coverage of her in the entertainment and sports press in Japan, helped in part by the fact she married a J-League player: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], etc. I believe this is sufficient to pass WP:GNG. Michitaro (talk) 13:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:08, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per sources above. Meets GNG. Cavarrone 14:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep: While notability is not inherited by her marriage to someone famous, I'd say her TV credits are sufficient to meet GNG. Montanabw(talk) 16:07, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Michitaro has identified that there is enough to satisfy GNG. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 04:27, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.