Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man of Sorrows (Hillsong song)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Without prejudice to a redirect to Hillsong Music Australia j⚛e deckertalk 16:36, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Man of Sorrows (Hillsong song)[edit]

Man of Sorrows (Hillsong song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Does not meet WP:NALBUMS. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:55, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete & redirect to Hillsong Music Australia. Not independently notable. Fails WP:GNG, fails WP:MUSIC, as either a song or a recording (especially since recording is just GNG). --Bejnar (talk) 16:27, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - don't particularly want to judge Australia by the same standards as the massive US Christian Music machine, but honestly not sure if almost any of Hillsong's output meets conventional notability. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:54, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Some have charted quite well in Australia and the US (made the Billboard 200) and they have more than one album that has achieved gold or higher status in one or both of those markets. This album isn't one of them, but there presently about 25 more up for AfDs. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:57, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.