Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man Camp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 14:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Man Camp[edit]

Man Camp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable film, no significant coverage, per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 00:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Radioactive (talk) 01:46, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 02:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I couldn't find anything about the film except plot summaries and castlists of IMDb quality (i.e. non-WP:RS). I could also find nothing worthwhile under the alternative titles Man Up and The Brazilian. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG.
Note: not to be confused with the 2019 film of the same name (1, 2, 3), which looks equally WP:NN. Narky Blert (talk) 03:54, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Pretty obscure movie, fails WP:N. How many people see these movies? 25? 35? Not notable at all. Ode+Joy (talk) 13:00, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • The use of viewership is not a viable deletion argument, as there are many unreleased and/or lost films that have articles which probably have a very small amount of people who have actually seen it. Coverage of films is what matters, not how many people have seen it. You should avoid using this in your arguments in the future. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:09, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.