Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malika Auger-Aliassime

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. given the state of NSPORTS, mostly and the lack of clear consensus on what the overarching guideline is. It could have been called nom withdrawn, but valid non keep vote from BilledMammal. I don't forsee consensus emerging after zero input following a relist seven days ago. Star Mississippi 01:39, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Malika Auger-Aliassime[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The player no longer meets notability guidelines per WP:NTENNIS and Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Sports notability #3. She has only participated in one WTA-level event and has not won any of the lower-level events. She is related to Félix Auger-Aliassime, who is a notable men's tennis player, but I'm not sure that makes her notable in isolation. Bonoahx (talk) 14:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Bonoahx (talk) 14:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bonoahx (talk) 14:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennis-related deletion discussions. Bonoahx (talk) 14:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bonoahx (talk) 14:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
~~'Redirect to her much more notable brother, Félix Auger-Aliassime, where she is mentioned.~~ Nfitz (talk) 16:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom and Nfitz. BilledMammal (talk) 02:01, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes Wikiproject Tennis Guideline. Played in the main draw of the WTA250 event Coupe Banque Nationale. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No longer passes WP:NTENNIS due to changes at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Sports notability. I already mentioned this. Bonoahx (talk) 09:43, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Per WP:LOCALCONSENSUS, the essay at Wikiproject Tennis cannot be used to support keeping an article that fails WP:GNG. BilledMammal (talk)
Keep - passes WP:NTENNIS. Now I read NTENNIS carefully, look to me like she meets it. Nfitz (talk) 22:36, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:NTENNIS seems to have been changed again pending yet another RfC. It seems a lot more contentious than I thought it did, I'll keep the AfD up but wouldn't have a problem having it be kept until there is a more stable version of NSPORTS. Bonoahx (talk) 00:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.