Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malik Jamshaid Azam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:45, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Malik Jamshaid Azam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Journalist with evidence of existence but no references about him rather than by him. Google searches find nothing significant using either the name in English or Urdu. Claims to awards that appear nowhere but his facebook page and here. Unsourced claims to being drama writer, model, actor, poet as well as journalist. noq (talk) 15:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. —innotata 19:23, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —innotata 19:23, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —innotata 19:23, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - He began writing only last March. Too soon to have an article here. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 17:02, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Without his own social networking sites, the article wouldn't even have references, and Facebook and Twitter are not appropriate references to begin with. Also, Wikipedia is not meant to be a directory, and other than some non-notable and unsourced info, that's what the article appears to be - a directory for listing and linking the subjects articles. There is also nothing that shows that the columns are "famous", that sounds like pov to me. Remove the directory of links and there would be very little left. Cmr08 (talk) 20:24, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom and above and not notable.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:49, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.