Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Make mine Milk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 14:48, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Make mine Milk[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

News release about an advertising campaign which is too recent to have gained any notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:38, 13 April 2011 (UTC) — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:38, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - appears to be a close connection between editor and article. Article reads like an advertorial and lacks notability.--Whiteguru (talk) 10:53, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no demonstrated noteworthiness sufficient to merit a standalone article. -- Rrburke (talk) 14:54, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The quickest of Google News searches shows that this is a high profile campaign attracting non-trivial coverage in the mainstream media. The article doesn't appear particularly spammy to me, and certainly not enough to qualify as "using Wikipedia for self-promotion". "Appears to be a close connection between editor and article" is not, and has never been, a deletion criterion. – iridescent 16:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.