Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makati Diamond Residences

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 12:50, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Makati Diamond Residences[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing notable about the property. Previous AfD was a procedural keep (too many articles in a single nomination). Cabayi (talk) 11:05, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 11:06, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing notable about this building. Ajf773 (talk) 02:14, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

comment it is reported to be 106.83 m (350.49 ft) tall. I have held elsewhere that buildings >= 100 m should be deemed notable, worldwide. As an alternative to deletion, at worst should this redirect to a row for it in List of tallest buildings in the Philippines? --Doncram (talk) 03:25, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Doncram, that list cuts off at #46, a spot shared by 7 buildings, which are 150m tall. This building doesn't make the cut for an entry on that list. Cabayi (talk) 09:36, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based on current sourcing to a directory and a primary source. Height is not inherently notable, but you would expect to see secondary sources for tall buildings. If this is one of them I haven't seen it yet. SportingFlyer talk 01:38, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete concur with nom. 28 story building, WP:MILL. MB 04:26, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.