Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major League Gaming (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was indef semi-protected. Protected by User:Courcelles; status as a heavily-vandalized article is not a valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 08:34, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Major League Gaming[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm getting tired of editing back the IP edits. Besides, this article is really only edited once a year, so it's mostly useless. This article has come a long way since I revamped it soon after the first AfD nomination, but I think it's time to finally put it to sleep. Treyvo (talk) 05:55, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm a little confused... are you saying this business is not notable, or that it's notable but too tempting a target for vandalism or bad edits? 28bytes (talk) 06:08, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: requested semi-protection. See no reason to delete the article. Yoenit (talk) 06:49, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the vandalism is excessive. Placed an indef semi-protection. Can the next admin through here shut this thing down? Courcelles 06:54, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.