Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major J. Jones

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Major J. Jones[edit]

Major J. Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is hard to AfD because this is a well-written article, kudos to the author, but Mr. Jones does not appear to meet notability guidelines. Not as an author (they may have been good but don't appear to have been especially notable), his association with the SCLC/MLK doesn't matter per WP:INVALIDBIO. Mr. Vernon (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment It looks like the article creator had it in AfC but it was rejected, then they created the article directly on Wikipedia instead of working with AfC on sources. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 07:59, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes that is indeed what happened. If this article is deleted the draft should also be deleted, if the article is kept the draft should be redirected to the article. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:26, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, per the entry in this print encyclopedia from a major publisher. And, according to its index, Jones has coverage on six different pages of ISBN 9781608330355. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 12:13, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.