Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majlis Tahaffuz Khatme Nabuwwat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tehreek-e-Khatme Nabuwwat. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Majlis Tahaffuz Khatme Nabuwwat[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single-sourced POV fork of Tehreek-e-Khatme Nabuwwat, with largely similar text. Conversion to redirect was reverted, PROD was removed, so here we are. I've been tempted to just nuke this under A10, as was originally requested, but feel that it could be a valid redirect. Yunshui 雲‍水 11:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per this source (pg 344-345), that says that it is the same group. Started as "Tehreek e Khatme Nabuwwat", renamed to "Majlis e Khatm e Nabuwwat" and later as "Majlis e Tahaffuz Khatm e Nabuwwat". -- SMS ^Talk 12:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Due to the evidence provided of the organizations being the same thing. That it even had to come this far is a bit silly; it seems someone has a POV ax to grind here. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:37, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.