Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maitreyi Ramakrishnan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy (talk) 10:43, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maitreyi Ramakrishnan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Well she has received recognition for appearing in an upcoming TV series which is yet to be released in Netflix. Though she passes WP:GNG, the subject is a kind of WP:TOOSOON and fails WP:NACTOR. No one has seen her yet in any major films or TV series. The Afd might be controversial but the subject is matching WP:1E. She might not be considered to be noteworthy as a Wikipedia entry just because being chosen by a prominent actress Mindy Kaling. I believe the article can be kept as a redirect target to Never Have I Ever (TV series) Abishe (talk) 08:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 08:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 08:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 08:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week keep or redirect - Subject has received much coverage due to her new role. Could also restore the redirect to Never Have I Ever (TV series). Possibly a case of WP:TOOSOON. TJMSmith (talk) 12:23, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I have added in a variety of sources and this article meets WP:SIGCOV and I would argue TOOSOON does not apply because the show has already been reviewed by critics and she has been featured in multiple major secondary sources, as it comes out in a week. She also has sources consistently in major news organizations since the middle of 2019.Affied (talk) 13:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep or Redirect: The nominator acknowledges that WP:GNG is not in issue, and I do agree that WP:NACTOR isn't technically met. So, I would agree that this may be a case of WP:TOOSOON, but I wouldn't be averse to letting the article stand, given the current media interest in the subject. If, however, the consensus is to "Delete" the article, then I would certainly support a "redirect", as proposed above. Dflaw4 (talk) 03:38, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep as argued above. Maybe a little too soon to have a solid article, but the content is well sourced enough and GNG seems met. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:46, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. The article itself is well done, but I feel this is a case of Too Soon--Mpen320 (talk) 22:31, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.