Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mailjet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that this company does not meet notability standards to qualify for an article. North America1000 04:45, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mailjet[edit]

Mailjet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obvious COI and promotionally written article created and primarily written by a Mailjet and at least one other (if not the same) COI user, consisting mostly of enticement over all the cool things the product can do. Meanwhile, I find scant mention of this product in independent reliable sources, so notability is not established. Of the sources cited, most are press releases or rote announcements about capital raising. One of the TechCrunch articles helps, but it isn't enough. Largoplazo (talk) 18:35, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:16, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:16, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:16, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 14:42, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Existing references largely fail WP:ORGIND, topic therefore fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 14:19, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: An article originally by Mailjet and subsequently developed by further WP:SPAs. It describes the company funding and makes claims for the features of their products, backed by press releases. My searches are also finding partnership announcements but not the WP:RS coverage needed for WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 19:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.