Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahsum Akkuş

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mahsum Akkuş[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NHOCKEY. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 03:45, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 03:45, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 03:45, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He plays in the top Turkish league. the criteria states "Played one or more games in an amateur league considered, through lack of a professional league, the highest level of competition extant". CeeGee 05:46, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The Turkish league is not listed here [1] as being part of that list. So therefore the player fails notability. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are many nearby higher profile professional leagues for this player to play in, so they in no way pass NHOCKEY. I don't know for absolute certain that turkish sources would not pass GNG, but cannot find anything myself.18abruce (talk) 16:34, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No evidence the subject meets the GNG. As far as CeeGee's claim goes, that's not only completely inaccurate, the premise is flatout absurd; that would inevitably lead to beer leaguers in Peru or Nauru claiming presumptive notability. Criterion #2 pertains to two specific periods in hockey history: the pre-professional days of the 19th century Canadian top leagues, and the Cold War-era "amateur" leagues of the Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia, where professional leagues were banned and the players not allowed to go elsewhere. NHOCKEY does not, and never has, presumed that amateur players all around the world are notable. Ravenswing 14:56, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails to meet NHOCKEY as they did not play in a league that meets the second criteria. Also I can find nothing that shows they meet GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 15:41, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Coverage does not appear to meet WP:GNG and no indication of meeting any criteria of WP:NHOCKEY. Papaursa (talk) 23:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.