Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahmoud Zoufonoun
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Snowball keep. Non-admin closure. Chris (talk) 17:14, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Mahmoud Zoufonoun[edit]
- Mahmoud Zoufonoun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No in-line citations. Doesn't conform to BLP or Verifiability guidlines. Beeshoney (talk) 12:27, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - although no inline citations are provided, there are third-party, independent reliable sources linked to in the article and the notability of the subject is not in question. I doubt there is any contentious material from a BLP point of view, but if there is I would suggest the nominator identify it for cleanup rather than rushing to deletion. Thparkth (talk) 12:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep (ec) a notable musician, the article needs work, but it is expandable/verifiable, see [1] [2]. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 12:54, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above - certainly a candidate for a good clean but pretty well established notability with a couple of sources to back it up. Probably needs cutting back --Errant Tmorton166(Talk) 12:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - per Thparkth and others. --John (talk) 13:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep/Speedy Keep per all above. WP:POINTY nomination made despite substantial evidence of notability and sourceabiity. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Seems to satisfy WP:CREATIVE. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 16:37, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.