Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahler: Symphony No. 1; Blumine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No objections after several weeks. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mahler: Symphony No. 1; Blumine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Outside the allmusic review, there is no coverage to constitute notability. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 07:55, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have added two more reviews by by-lined critics: one from The Gramophone, the other from Classical Net. Together with the Allmusic review, I would have said that these are sufficient for WP:NALBUM criterion 1. This would therefore have been a "Keep" opinion had I not noticed that the distinct criterion 1 at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Classical_music/Guidelines#Notability_of_recordings places a higher bar for such recordings than for other genres. AllyD (talk) 09:00, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 00:28, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.