Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahika sharma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 18:53, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mahika sharma[edit]

Mahika sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sadly, no evidence of notability. Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. WP:NYA and WP:TOOSOON to merit a page. If ever, certainly not today. Wikicology (talk) 21:24, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. While there is some sort of an allegation of notability, the article is such a mess that I can't make any sense of it. Is the subject a social worker who became an actress, or vice versa? What is an Annamise film? Bearian (talk) 15:53, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "'Mahika sharma"' – artice should not be deleted as it has suitable links and the girl has been working hard in life with helping poor. She has been popular in the state of assam and people are found reading the article.. kindly its assamise film not annamise film. Thnks User:Wikiwikiperson
  • Comment I moved it to the correctly capitalized name, so either it is deleted or survives it would be with the correct name, Mahika Sharma. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 19:42, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails all notability guidelines. Poorly sourced. Can't even consider for WP:TOOSOON. Please delete. Athachil (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 11:04, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "'REMOVE ALL KIND OF ISSUES"' why sud the article sud b deleted the source are enough it should not be...wiki is for everyone its not only for you guys who want it to be deleted. We are het fan and we think her hardworking sud get wiki name.. soo pls remove issue asap.. do it nw..
  • Delete Awful, awful, awful. Notability is questionable, but it at least falls under "Blow it up" (per TNT). GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:31, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.