Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahbuba Islam Rakhi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 20:35, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mahbuba Islam Rakhi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG as the sources are not reliable and significant. Winning in a beauty contest does not make her notable. Arr4 (talk) 15:00, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Arr4 (talk) 17:53, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Multiple independent in depth news articles, Acted in TV Shows, Commercials, Music Video Model, TV show host on National TV. I am adding some reliable sources.. Article has enormous room for improvement but subject is easily Notable. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 18:50, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Constructive edits are always welcomed. Please improve the article with RS as much as you can. - Arr4 (talk) 21:49, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 10:38, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now and draft/userfy I suppose if wished but my searches found nothing so it's possible sole coverage is in Bangladesh (no IMDb either). Some of the current sources are from good news sources while others are not solid. SwisterTwister talk 05:03, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep, as the article is well sourced for an actress. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 15:34, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:00, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as subject appears to cross the verifiability and notability thresholds. - Dravecky (talk) 15:14, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.