Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maharishi Patanjali Vidya Mandir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bucketsofg 20:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maharishi Patanjali Vidya Mandir[edit]

A school in India that fails WP:ORG. PROD in October 06 was contested with comment: "Google shows it exists". That is undoubted. However, the article contains no hint why the school should be notable. -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 12:59, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with comment Google shows I exist, but it doesn't mean I get an article. Nothing to suggest notability here. The school website, "under construction", is a deadlink.--Ispy1981 15:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's more like a dictionary than an article.--Edtropolis 15:56, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The present article is completely uninformative. A pity as Wikipedia has very poor coverage of Indian schools. I'm sure there is plenty of scope to expand the article if anyone was interested enough to take it on. Dahliarose 12:27, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- ⇒ bsnowball 11:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:53, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:N and WP:V due to no sources. --Butseriouslyfolks 16:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to not establishing notability or context. The school does exist and could be notable in some form, but the current article is not worth keeping. Camaron1 | Chris 19:18, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Per WP:CSD A7, and page has been so tagged. Unremarkable subject with little to no context about it nor any information which meets WP:N and WP:V. Thewinchester ^(talk) 14:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.