Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maharaja Atithi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kusha (Ramayana). Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:54, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maharaja Atithi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a minor figure mentioned in the Ramayana, I can't find any coverage that goes beyond mere mentions searching online and on Google Scholar. Restore redirect to the subject's more notable relative, Kusha (Ramayana), as this page now been the subject of an edit war. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:11, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:11, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:11, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But in kusha (ramayana) article it is mentioned briefly .Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 03:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You need to find sources that add up to WP:GNG to justify the creation of an article. I looked before starting this AfD and couldn't find anything in a few minutes, but if you try hard you might turn something up. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 03:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok please tell me the example of sources or tell me way where I can find that type of sources.Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 15:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We need reliable secondary sources that devote significant analysis (i.e. full paragraphs) to Atithi's historical or literary role. I already looked using internet searches and Google Scholar and didn't find anything useful. You could try again in those same places and hope that you get luckier, try searching in languages other than English that may have relevant scholarship, or try going to an academic library to find texts that have not been digitized. You can ask for more help with identifying sources at the teahouse. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have found one sources in English on google scholar which discribs the lineage of suryavansha after lord Rama through king Kusha. After the kusha the name Atithi was thir but not I do not found about him . But the information I have given in this article is from wikipedia article Kusha (Ramayana). In which the information about Atithi is given in section of Kusha (Ramayana)#Leter history.So you cheake it this article and the title of article Maharaja Atithi I kept because ,their are another article on wikipedia having title of Atithi for ex:-Atithi.Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 04:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom. Fails WP:SIGCOV as a stand alone article.4meter4 (talk) 02:52, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.