Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnus Kjøller

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:28, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Magnus Kjøller[edit]

Magnus Kjøller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity page for a Danish entrepreneur. Pieced together from trivial mentions, primary sources such as his own twitter feed and his own company posting videos of his charitable activities. There is no substantial coverage in independent, reliable sources. Mduvekot (talk) 11:38, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 13:35, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 13:35, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 13:35, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom as a blatantly promotional / vanity bio written by an SPA with no trace of notability. --Lockley (talk) 19:57, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 12:00, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 09:36, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as "bio spam" on this "multi-entrepreneur, business angel,[1] business commentator and society debater[2]" -- not notable in any of the fields mentioned, whatever they are :-). K.e.coffman (talk) 01:21, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.