Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnus Aarbakke

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2009 March 11.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. Owen× ☎ 15:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Magnus Aarbakke[edit]

No major notability established outside of a Supreme Court Justice. seicer | talk | contribs 13:13, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Like national legislators, Supreme Court Justices must be, and are, inherently notable. This person has an entry in a paper encyclopedia, so it easily meets WP:V and WP:N. Punkmorten (talk) 13:32, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep (Speedy keep?). If this person was a supreme court justice in America I'm fairly sure this nomination would never have been made. As stated above Supreme Court Justices meet WP:POLITICIAN as "People who have held international, national or first-level sub-national political office, including members of a legislature and judges" and the fact that it's in a non-english speaking country is irrelevant. A stated above the article also meets WP:V and WP:N although more sources would be useful. Dpmuk (talk) 14:03, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 15:19, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 15:19, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.