Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic in Once Upon a Time

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:18, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Magic in Once Upon a Time[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally unsourced, completely in-universe article, does not meet general notability guidelines. -- Alex^TW 05:35, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:59, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:59, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Looks like unsourced original research to me, and I doubt it can be adequately sourced. If anyone feels any of it can be sourced and merged to the series article(s) I would be ok with that. --Michig (talk) 07:00, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:OR and unlikely to be a notable topic. Ajf773 (talk) 07:03, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete this painfully WP:FANCRUFTy WP:ESSAY. Mangoe (talk) 17:55, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Compare to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Wizards of Waverly Place spells; a list of unnotable plot devices. Nate • (chatter) 19:13, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the entire articles content is more appropriate for a fansite not an encyclopedia. Esuka323 (talk) 19:55, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete given the above discussion. I would not be opposed to a redirect to the article on the main television show, but I doubt enough people would type this phrase out in full during a Wikipedia search to justify it. Aoba47 (talk) 19:05, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lots of unsourced research as stated above. Delete as per WP:ISNOT, since this appears to be a personal essay. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:27, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:39, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.