Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggie Tsang

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus to keep. Michig (talk) 09:54, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maggie Tsang[edit]

Maggie Tsang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet any speedy criterion, but I suggest a snow delete as a blatant BLP ONEEVENT violation. DGG ( talk ) 06:08, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:18, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Conditional keep popular TV actress back in the days. More should be added about her career. BTW, forename is incorrect, it should be 'Margie'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.26.220.45 (talk) 08:38, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
    1. 孟欢欢 (2009-02-07). "热点评论:明星复出后冰火两重天(图)" (in Chinese). Phoenix Television. Archived from the original on 2009-02-17. Retrieved 2020-03-28.
    2. 黃一平 (2006-08-26). "曾華倩被逼供 處女獻偉仔". Apple Daily (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2020-03-28. Retrieved 2020-03-28.
    3. Jennifer (2016-03-06). "她與梁朝偉有刻苦情 友人爆料:當晚就獻身啦?". China Times (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2020-03-28. Retrieved 2020-03-28.
    4. 程韵 (2004-09-14). "刘嘉玲曾华倩相逢泯恩仇 笑谈"分享"梁朝伟". People's Daily (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2008-06-02. Retrieved 2020-03-28.
    5. 黃曉陽 (2009). "梁朝偉與曾華倩黎美嫻劉嘉玲的愛情糾葛" (in Chinese). Sina Corp. Archived from the original on 2016-12-29. Retrieved 2020-03-28.
    6. 宋争 (2002-04-21). "曾华倩离婚内幕:专横独断婆媳不和[多图]". zh:东方网 (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2020-03-28. Retrieved 2020-03-28.
    7. "中风前兆?梁朝伟初恋曾华倩脸部扭曲口齿不清". Sina Corp (in Chinese). 2018-05-22. Archived from the original on 2020-03-28. Retrieved 2020-03-28.
    There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Margie Tsang to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

    Cunard (talk) 11:10, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • The "Controversies" section is undue weight and should be removed entirely or significantly trimmed.

    I added some biographical information about her career after she signed a contract with TVB.

    Cunard (talk) 11:10, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - I think there is enough coverage to establish notability WP:GNG. As noted above, her name is incorrect. Margie Tsang and Margie Tsang Wah Sin are correct. Article should be improved, and not deleted. Netherzone (talk) 14:25, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note I have deleted the "controversies" section out of undue weight and WP:BLP concerns. I have also moved the article from Maggie Tsang to Margie Tsang. Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 09:48, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: The subject passes WP:NACTOR. Assuming the Chinese sources listed above provide reliable and significant coverage, there shouldn't be any issue passing WP:GNG, either. Dflaw4 (talk) 02:45, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.