Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggie Sajak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. LibStar (talk) 14:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maggie Sajak[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:MUSICBIO. Way too early in career LibStar (talk) 14:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She may be early in her career, however she does not fail WP:MUSICBIO. There are plenty of non-trivial mentions of her in third party sources if you just Google it. [1] [2] [3] [4].. and that's just from the top half of the first page of results... —CodeHydro 15:14, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Additional examples of substantial coverage: Billboard [5], Fox News [6], Washington Examiner\PopSugar [7], CMT [8]. --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:37, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.