Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggie Gobran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 05:42, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maggie Gobran[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO . if the claim "Gobran have several times been nominated for the Nobel Prize" was true she would appear several times in the media. yet only gets 2 gnews hits. [1]. and no reliable sources to back the claim [2]. LibStar (talk) 00:56, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. -- Jujutacular ^talk 14:44, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While she appears to be doing noble work, the 4 GBooks hits seem merely to establish her existence, not her meeting Wikipedia guidelines for notability. No prejudice against re-creation should she later meet those guidelines. Edward321 (talk) 17:15, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not significant coverage. I should note that does not mean she wasn't nominated for the Nobel....over one-hundred people are nominated for the Nobel each year and the quirky nominating system means that some of them are far more obscure than Gobran Vrivers (talk) 10:51, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.