Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madison Parker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:30, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Madison Parker[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO & GNG Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:59, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:BIO, and WP:GNG. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:34, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - many nominations to awards, 10 x interwiki, notable. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 08:29, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails PORNBIO without award wins. Multiple nominations are not enough. Fails GNG without significant coverage by reliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as has won many awards, passes PORNBIO & GNG, This !vote has absolutely nothing to do with the infobox image and or her looks ... –Davey2010^Talk 00:47, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Davey2010 how does she pass PORNBIO? There are no wins or RS in the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:25, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 00:11, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Multiple nominations (there are no wins) do not satisfy WP:PORNBIO, and there is zero coverage in reliable sources. Not sure why this was relisted; Subtropical Man's votes in porn BLPs are routinely discarded as they violate project policy and guideline alike, while Davey2010's makes a demonstrably false claim of as has won many awards that he has yet to explain. Tarc (talk) 01:17, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:PORNBIO. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:31, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails PORNBIO with merely nominations and no wins. No sources to suggest she could pass GNG. Finnegas (talk) 23:28, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete My sweeps of US News, international news, entertainment-related, and Hungarian news did not reveal anything suggesting she meets the WP:GNG. Note there may be confusion with a different Madison Parker such as here.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:17, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete multiple nominations with no wins does not make someone notable in this industry, it probably indicates the latter. The pornography industry engages in award inflation to a level where just being nominated for an award is meaningless.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:59, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The keep !votes (one of which appears to have been a joke) are so flimsy this didn't need to be relisted. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 00:58, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.