Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madhussneha Upadhyay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:53, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Madhussneha Upadhyay[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No strong indication of notability. The article claims that she's an actress, model, comedian and dancer, yet provides nothing to support acting, modeling, or comedy. According to the article she appeared in one song (as a dancer? An actor? An actordancer?) in the 2015 Indian Telugu-language film Baahubali: The Beginning. Zero Google News hits for Madhussneha Upadhyay, but there are some hits for Sneha Upadhyay and Madhu Sneha. I don't see any that suggest we're meeting the significant coverage or independent requirements of the WP:GNG. This is an interview. There is some mention of her here, but it's basically press-release-style content. This short article says that she's got a lot of buzz, but hasn't done much in Tollywood (Telugu cinema)--so why are we focusing on her? WP:TOOSOON. This has the feel of a vanity/paid article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:13, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:54, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:54, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:54, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:25, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Apparently she is only known for a part in a video. Despite the sources given (she must have a good publicist), I can't see how that would qualify her under WP:NACTOR without multiple significant roles. While it is possible that she may qualify in the future she doesn't qualify for now. Hzh (talk) 21:30, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 13:13, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.