Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madhuraa Bhattacharya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:24, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Madhuraa Bhattacharya[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It isn't clear that she qualifies for A7 speedy deletion but I can't find anything of substance about her under either of her names as written in Roman letters, and nothing but this article and three pages from the same lyrics site under her name as written in Bengali. Doesn't meet WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:MUSICIAN. All of the sources given are affiliated or are other Wikipedia articles. On top of that, the entire article is written from a fan's point of view. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:36, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:40, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:40, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - "written from a fan's point of view" is something that can be corrected and is no reason for deletion. However, failure to meet notability guidelines is. I found a few references such as these passing mentions [1], [2], & [3] so there is more than just mirror sites. I am not sure if there is a name issue as the article states she changed her name in 2013. I guess I will wait and see if someone has any better luck finding more in depth sources prior to casting a !vote.--CNMall41 (talk) 21:17, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unfortunately, despite several warnings and G11 speedy deletions, the same contributor keeps recreating the article, under variations of the title, with the same promotional wording. I see no option but to delete. Deb (talk) 10:58, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:09, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as the listed sources are instantly signs this may not be improvable material and so if there is none, there's nothing to suggest keeping at this time. SwisterTwister talk 17:20, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - searches did not turn up enough to show they meet notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:33, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.