Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madhuja Mukherjee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:35, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Madhuja Mukherjee[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant advert with inline links to various things created by the subject. WP:BOMBARD. Three paragraphs and a couple of tables do not warrant 30 references. Disputed draftification. WP:ADMASQ, fails WP:NPROF and WP:NCREATIVE. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Actors and filmmakers, Authors, Education, and India. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete possibly via G5 depending on how Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khorang shakes out. Bad faith creation for sure. Star Mississippi 14:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete or Draftify with Protection at this time, pending further review - It is clear from the conduct of the author(s) of the article that they are more interested in having an article accepted than in discussing whether an article should be accepted. There are too many references, which is an obvious attempt to overwhelm the review process, but too many of them are to her own work or are otherwise not independent and reliable. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I pared down the references by creating a Works section and removing reprints and excess citations, and then added a few more citations, including from the WP Library about her work as an inter-media artist. She is a professor and has edited several books, but I have only so far found one review for one of the books. There are also a few reviews related to her work in film. Beccaynr (talk) 04:07, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.