Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madhu Singhal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Madhu Singhal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable activist; no meaningful external references to indicate notability of this biography. Orange Mike | Talk 21:34, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article reads like a resume intended to glorify its subject. Has done nothing truly notable; mostly won various awards and made general contributions toward the welfare of other people, but nothing to set her apart from others in the same endeavors. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 21:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Subject is covered by reliable sources. The Times of India and Deccan Herald are in the article. Also found coverage on Al Jazeera. The article itself is poorly written and sounds promotional, but should be re-written rather than deleted. Elia Soaten (talk) 22:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keep, notable subject but needs to be rewritten under guidelines of WP:MOS --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 17:15, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
keep - notable subject. Found relevant citations. Needs to be added. Haribhagirath (talk) 06:37, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Subject is clearly notable. Article needs editing but its problems are not serious enough to justify deletion. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:23, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.