Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madelyn Marie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:24, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Madelyn Marie[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PORNBIO, no indication the subject can satisfy the GNG or any other specialized guideline, promotionally written. PROD declined on the grounds that "'Has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media' may apply," which was strikingly bizarre, since the article did not claim any mainstream appearances or references! Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:03, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. As the article stands, it fails PORNBIO and GNG. EuroPride (talk) 15:42, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable third party secondary sources adress this individual in any substantial detail - PORNBIO is depreciated, but does not even meet that. Hipocrite (talk) 13:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG and PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 15:59, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Her coverage doesn't seem adequate enough for the GNG for now. Morbidthoughts (talk) 15:42, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.