Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeleine Hetherton-Miau

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 07:05, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Madeleine Hetherton-Miau[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo/vanity piece by COI editor on a non-notable filmmaker. The refbombing consists mostly of coverage of her company or their productions, not of herself, plus a few short bios clearly supplied by the subject or someone close to her; virtually all are primary, and none are RS or provide anything even resembling significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ANYBIO / WP:FILMMAKER. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Clearly she is very productive, but, the sourcing, and my own due diligence via the web doesn't present anything that convinces me this subject passes WP:GNG nor WP:BASIC. Missvain (talk) 00:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheChronium 11:38, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A lot of the references are about her work or her company, not about her. I liked the first two references. Alack, its a deltree. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:24, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.