Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maddigunta Narasimha Rao

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:52, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maddigunta Narasimha Rao[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find a reliable source talking about subject. Fails Notability, possible WP:ARTSPAM Evano1van (talk) 07:40, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Clearly fails WP:NOTABILITY. I can't find anything at all that could prove the topic to be notable. It can also be PRODed for being a biography of a living person without any references. smtchahal^(talk) 12:51, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: One or two lines won't make an article. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 05:22, 20 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. The subject turned up on a few blogs, possibly his own. Fails WP:GNG hardcore. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:32, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Everything I found appears to be self-written and/or self-created, so it fails on both notability and third-party source criteria. His S S M Ashramam is also nominated for deletion, and I could find no sources at all which would suggest notability on that basis either; even the person arguing for Keep could only cite their own blog, a Google Maps entry and a directory listing, all of which obviously fail on both notability and reliable sources grounds. HillbillyGoat (talk) 22:18, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 12:36, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
keep. keep some more days to establish notability.There are some references such as High court orders regard to Maddigunta Narasimha Rao. I think it will clear proof of notability.So some more time needed to show the same.(Manavu (talk) 00:54, 26 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.