Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madame Hillary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Emmett Tyrell. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 (T) 01:03, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Madame Hillary[edit]

Madame Hillary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any evidence that this is a notable book. The sources I can find (reviews I mean) are like Chapin's and Rosin's only really mention the book in the context of Hillary Clinton hatred. Ricky81682 (talk) 03:15, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Maybe mention somewhere else and redirect as although I found some more links here and here which have some reviews but maybe not for better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:53, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, maybe redirect to Emmett Tyrell, who is identified as the principal author of the book. Tyrell is notable; I can find no evidence to substantiate a finding of separate notability for this book. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:56, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Emmett Tyrell Heyyouoverthere (talk) 10:30, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.