Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macau Asia Express
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge/redirect. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:29, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Macau Asia Express[edit]
- Macau Asia Express (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Speedy deletion for this article was once declined, due to the sources that might be an indicator for notability. Still, I don't think they are sufficient for the significant coverage in reliable third-party sources neccessary to pass WP:CORP. This is a failed company, which did not do anything more than announcing its plans to offer some low-cost flights to China, which never materialized. Therefore, I cannot see any encyclopedic relevance. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 09:39, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Air Macau : Planned-only companies are inherently non-notable unless there is a specific reason and substantial third party coverage to make such a company especially notable - which I cannot find in this case. The info should be put in the Air Macau article, which was the parent company as per [1] Travelbird (talk) 17:27, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:19, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.