Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macaire le Copte

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ifnord (talk) 05:16, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Macaire le Copte[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NBOOK nor GNG. » Shadowowl | talk 12:14, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete totally fails verifiability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:16, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's trivial to verify the existence of this work and there seems to be significant coverage in François Weyergans: Romancier. Andrew D. (talk) 22:38, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:07, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:07, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 14:43, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Andrew Davidson. As a winner of the Prix des Deux Magots and the Prix Victor-Rossel, this book also satisfies criteria 2 of the guideline WP:NBOOK. James500 (talk) 21:44, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect pending someone introducing some accurate, verifiable information that isn't already included in François Weyergans. Having a one-sentence article that only duplicates a fraction of the relevant information in the main article is unhelpful. No comment on notability or potential to become more than a useless non-article. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 23:27, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This article contains accurate, verifiable information that is not included in the article about François Weyergans. This article is more than one sentence long. WP:PRESERVE applies to the content of this article. James500 (talk) 00:15, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable as winner of major prize (Deux Magots) and with scope for expansion. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:22, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 11:38, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as prize-winning novel with published reviews. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:09, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:NBOOK, has won significant awards. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:07, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.