Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mable (Company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:28, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mable (Company)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. Appears to be advertising for a company, there is no encyclopaedic value whatsoever. I cannot see how this article could possibly be improved and should be deleted given even a Google search produces few results other than company reviews and its own primary business page. Such-change47 (talk) 11:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Such-change47 (talk) 11:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, can't find meaningful coverage anywhere. JonnyDKeen (talk) 17:54, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't the Financial Review source by a staff reporter in reference 3 a reliable source? The other Financial Review sources are by a contributor so that would probably rule those out Atlantic306 (talk) 03:14, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article reads more like a promotional summary than anything, and not enough is presented to establish why this company is notable.TH1980 (talk) 03:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:N. Aasim (talk) 19:19, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I reviewed the financial review article mentioned above. All it contains about Mable (formerly "Better Caring") is primary info, as it is comprised solely of quotes from a Mable co-founder. -- rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 20:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG, lacks in depth coverage about the company.Juggyevil (talk) 08:23, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no significant coverage. 3 sources are from the same publication. Jaxarnolds (talk) 03:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.